Title: The Rule of Three
Author: Eric Walters
Pub Date: January 21st, 2014
Publisher: FSG Books/Penguin
Page Count: 405
Author: Eric Walters
Pub Date: January 21st, 2014
Publisher: FSG Books/Penguin
Page Count: 405
One shocking afternoon, computers around the globe shut down in a viral catastrophe. At sixteen-year-old Adam Daley’s high school, the problem first seems to be a typical electrical outage, until students discover that cell phones are down, municipal utilities are failing, and a few computer-free cars like Adam’s are the only vehicles that function. Driving home, Adam encounters a storm tide of anger and fear as the region becomes paralyzed. Soon—as resources dwindle, crises mount, and chaos descends—he will see his suburban neighborhood band together for protection. And Adam will understand that having a police captain for a mother and a retired government spy living next door are not just the facts of his life but the keys to his survival, in The Rule of Three by Eric Walters.
The Setting of "The Rule of Three"
I like – whenever possible – to experience the things that
my characters are going through. This has
involved walking across the Maasai Mara (Alexandria of Africa), crossing the
Sahara Desert on foot (Just Deserts), climbing Kilimanjaro (Between Heaven and
Earth) and walking across Kenya (Walking Home).
I sometimes consider myself a ‘method writer’ as I love to get into my
characters’ heads by walking in their shoes.
In creating The Rule of Three I was making a dystopian novel
that wasn’t set in some future time or on another planet or place but in the
here and now. I needed a neighborhood
that I could experience and where the story was going to take place. It seemed
only natural to use the neighborhood I know best – my own. In fact the house that the characters live in
is my house and the old Oldsmobile Omega driven by my main character, Adam, was
the first car my son owned – the car he inherited when his grandfather passed
away.
I’ve lived in this neighborhood for twenty-five years. I know the streets, the little creeks, the
schools and stores, the places where walls exist – as sound barriers at the
highway – as well as I’ve ever known any area in my life. These are the places where I live, walk,
shop, play, visit, and walk my dogs. I
know them the way Adam and his mother and Herb need to know their neighborhood
in the story. This dose of realism means
that I if I had to question a logistics question, the where/when/how of the
story, all I had to do was go for a walk.
I didn’t have to visualize in my head what I could see with my eyes.
This often meant that I was strolling around the neighborhood
-sometimes at two in the morning - walking the routes taken by my
characters. It’s a little bit eerie when
you’re out to do a little research, in the dark, the neighborhood silent and
asleep, alone, and then you stumble into a raccoon, possum, deer or coyote. It was often a contest as to which of us
would jump higher in startled response. Apparently
me and wild animals are the only living things that seem to be awake and on the
streets in the suburbs in the middle of the night. When I was writing about Erindale Secondary
School or the Police Station or the bridge across Burnham (actually
Burhamthorpe) I simply went and visited, stood there, made notes, took pictures
or sat down with my note pad or computer and began to write.
I looked at my neighborhood on maps, on Google, and found that
my dogs and I were part of street view. If you go street to street in the
neighborhood bound by Highway 403, Erin Mills Parkway, Mississauga Road and
Burhamthorpe you’ll find me (black baseball cap, red shirt) and my two dogs
(one big poodle and one little white poodle) apparently staring at the Google
car.
While this level of realism helped to make the story much
more realistic it also made the story play in my head in a too real way. As I said, this story doesn’t take place in
some future time or distant place but right now, right here. What was happening in my story, to my
characters, started embedding in my head in such a way that there was a level
where real and fiction seemed to blur.
I’d be down by the river and see that it had rained and think ‘that’s
great for the crops, we’ll have enough water’.
That was reassuring. However some
things weren’t reassuring. I found my
late night trips often had a level of almost anxiety. I could picture my ‘enemies’ in the story
scaling walls, going in through the gaps, coming along the creek. I’d wake up, the story in my head, and go
downstairs to make sure the front door was locked. After all, this is the door in my story and
there are dangerous, desperate forces out there trying to kill me. I thought about getting more supplies into
the house, how much chlorine did we have for the pool (and for disinfecting
water drinking water), and perhaps, most troubling, about getting a gun. I don’t like guns but suddenly it seemed like
a good idea. For the record, those
thoughts passed.
While there is an element of science fiction in this story –
the air borne computer virus – the rest is real. If that one fact took place all of the rest
would take place. This isn’t some wild
fantasy but the reality of how people would react, what we would do and need to
do to survive. At the heart of it I
guess I got caught up in the central theme of the book – what would you do – what would I do – to survive?
Keep scrolling for my review!
My Thoughts.
I had my doubts about this novel at first, but as I kept reading, liked it overall.
We open with a teen talking to his best friend in a classroom. Then all the power just...goes out. Then the community of characters have to work together and try to survive.
I was really mellow with the plot. I feel like it could've been more exciting. I understand that it isn't an action movie and that it really isn't like a lot of dystopian. It's "society becoming dystopia," which we don't see has much in books as in movies. This book takes a more subtle and eloquent approach, rather than the whole "one person has to save the world" idea in movies. I was a little bored with the amount of talking done, but it was an okay story.
The setting. The biggest and main reason I had so much connecting the story, is because this is my town. No joke, The Rule of Three is set in my town. As in, those same streets mentioned in the book are ones I've been down. Because of this, I had an easier time going through the whole "what if this really happened?" idea. Because if it really happened, I would want the same thing Adam got; a community of people working together for their future.
I had absolutely no feels for any of the characters. I blame the writing for this one. Usually, it's the 3rd person speech that gets me, so I'm not even sure why I had trouble with this one. I felt like Adam was boring and Herb was trying too hard. Herb was an ex-spy but something about his actions kept reminding me of that and it just wasn't necessary. The characters just seemed flat to me. Again, they weren't bad, but I was very impartial to their future.
Do you see where this is going? I was really "meh" with everything. It was more if a "I didn't late it, but I didn't love it" scenario.
We open with a teen talking to his best friend in a classroom. Then all the power just...goes out. Then the community of characters have to work together and try to survive.
I was really mellow with the plot. I feel like it could've been more exciting. I understand that it isn't an action movie and that it really isn't like a lot of dystopian. It's "society becoming dystopia," which we don't see has much in books as in movies. This book takes a more subtle and eloquent approach, rather than the whole "one person has to save the world" idea in movies. I was a little bored with the amount of talking done, but it was an okay story.
The setting. The biggest and main reason I had so much connecting the story, is because this is my town. No joke, The Rule of Three is set in my town. As in, those same streets mentioned in the book are ones I've been down. Because of this, I had an easier time going through the whole "what if this really happened?" idea. Because if it really happened, I would want the same thing Adam got; a community of people working together for their future.
I had absolutely no feels for any of the characters. I blame the writing for this one. Usually, it's the 3rd person speech that gets me, so I'm not even sure why I had trouble with this one. I felt like Adam was boring and Herb was trying too hard. Herb was an ex-spy but something about his actions kept reminding me of that and it just wasn't necessary. The characters just seemed flat to me. Again, they weren't bad, but I was very impartial to their future.
Do you see where this is going? I was really "meh" with everything. It was more if a "I didn't late it, but I didn't love it" scenario.
I'm glad you liked this one! I agree, a setting is always so much more vivid and realistic when it's slightly based off of real life, and I love when settings are based off of real life. It's definitely super fun though. Thanks for sharing, Nova!
ReplyDelete